Why should people be forced to get vaccinated in order to protect others who choose not to get vaccinated??

johnsmith

Moderator
Staff member
:ROFL1:ROFL1:ROFL1:ROFL1

the problem with Chris and Shell is that they both have very similar debating styles .. and when faced with another version of themselves, even they find it unbearable after a time

:ROFL1:ROFL1:ROFL1:ROFL1
 

greggerypeccary

Active member
Just to be clear, I'm not condoning force in any way (as suggested in the thread title).

Just do it for your fellow human beings, you pathetic cowards.
 

johnsmith

Moderator
Staff member
they won't make it mandatory .. but those that choose not to have it can't cry when they're made to face the consequences of their actions. They might not care about putting others at risk but many businesses will care, or will care about any potential liability they might face, and so will deny them service. Especially those where people are crammed together like in planes and buses etc
 

Shellandshilo1956

Active member
the problem with Chris and Shell is that they both have very similar debating styles .. and when faced with another version of themselves, even they find it unbearable after a time
Actually, he is more like you whenever his position is challenged. He never uses logic or evidence to back up and defend his position. He misrepresents everything anyone says to save face. He denies any evidence without any relevant explanation why. He avoids and deflects any questions for clarity like the plague. You both have the same depth of knowledge. And you both use semantics and definitions as a security blanket. No matter how much factual data you deposit, it will never be enough, and always ignored. Yep you two have a lot more in common than you know.

In fact the only difference between you two, is that he simply distorts the words of others, to form endless meaningless question for others to continually answer. You, on the other hand, simple say that it is true, because you say that it is true. And, that everyone else is wrong, because you say everyone else is wrong. Both pretty much a waste of time and effort.
 

johnsmith

Moderator
Staff member
Actually, he is more like you whenever his position is challenged
he's nothing like me. I don't ask endless dumb questions repeatedly nor do I go off on unrelated tangents. Thats all you sunshine. And whilst I know it may be difficult for you to accept, people often see themselves differently to how others see them, it undeniable .
 

Shellandshilo1956

Active member
he's nothing like me. I don't ask endless dumb questions repeatedly nor do I go off on unrelated tangents. Thats all you sunshine. And whilst I know it may be difficult for you to accept, people often see themselves differently to how others see them, it undeniable .
I've already made that one distinction! Or did you even get past the first paragraph?

"In fact the only difference between you two, is that he simply distorts the words of others, to form endless meaningless question for others to continually answer.".

The rest is "..all you sunshine".

I am here to learn something new, share something obvious, challenge something false, and to defend something old. I'm only interested in what comes out of your mouth, NOT who you are. You could be a doctor, lawyer, bum, or even God, I don't care. I am NOT here to conform to popular beliefs, just for the sake of acceptance, validation, or to be popular. If this is just a glorified "men's club", then I don't want to be a member. But if this is a political forum for discussion, then that's fine.

What you say is certainly undeniable. But this also applies to you. I am far too old in the tooth for this kind of self-reflection. So maybe you should pay more attention to what I say, than in evaluating and attacking who I am. One, I can change, and the other I can't.

Here is an example. If the question/topic is, "number of days in a year", and I present the evidence that proves that there are 365 days in a year. And you raise the question that there can be 366 days in a year. Or, that it is really 365 1/4 days. And Chris says that there are more days in a Martian year(687days). And we then go off on these 2 irrelevant tangents, including the personal attacks. Eventually, I WILL give up, and stop wasting my time and efforts. You can't prove to anyone who believes he's Napoleon, that he isn't.

So when you make the statement that masks are made to protect other from you spreading this virus, then what would you think the most logical question would be? Then why would anyone who has tested negative, have already recovered, or are asymptomatic need to wear a mask for? The same applies to why these people would need to be vaccinated. The only rational answer you could give, would be "conformity". Just be like the rest of us. Don't think, just do what you are told. That's it! Anything else would be fallacious, and more self-serving parroted bullshit.
 

Chuck

Active member
Why did you object?
Simply because it was an invasion on my integrity, considering that management never forced other workers who were crook from the flu from leaving the worksite. The worst group were labour hire people, especially during overhaul periods.
Management were aware off them being sick but they simply ignored other workers request to leave the site.
 

johnsmith

Moderator
Staff member
I've already made that one distinction! Or did you even get past the first paragraph?
probably not ... and so what if you made that distinction? you in doing so were wrong. I am not. Just look at your rant after this first sentence , of course ending with more question ... i should change your user name from 'Shellandshilo1956' to 'Chris wannabe'
 

chris155au

Active member
he's nothing like me. I don't ask endless dumb questions repeatedly nor do I go off on unrelated tangents. Thats all you sunshine. And whilst I know it may be difficult for you to accept, people often see themselves differently to how others see them, it undeniable .
"Dumb questions" meaning scrutinising questions which you struggle to answer! :ROFL1
 

Shellandshilo1956

Active member
probably not ... and so what if you made that distinction? you in doing so were wrong. I am not. Just look at your rant after this first sentence , of course ending with more question ... i should change your user name from 'Shellandshilo1956' to 'Chris wannabe'
I don't give a shit about Chris, or any of the nonsense that comes out of either of you two's mouths.

It is truly sad, that rather than own up to the fact that you failed to read all of my post, and then conclude something even more stupid than usual, says it all about you. And then try to hit a nerve that you really think exist to save face, says even more about you. You should be called "huff and puff, avoid and distract". Because this is all that you can offer, EVEN ON YOUR BEST DAY!!
 

chris155au

Active member
the problem with Chris and Shell is that they both have very similar debating styles .. and when faced with another version of themselves, even they find it unbearable after a time
Nope, I just keep on going, while people such as yourself HOPELESSLY drop out of debate! :ROFL1
 

Shellandshilo1956

Active member
In actual fact, I literally just quote your posts back to you and use your words against you!

No you don't. And this says it all,

"Nope, I just keep on going, while people such as yourself HOPELESSLY drop out of debate..".

You enter into a debate ONLY TO GO THE DISTANCE? You are NOT searching for knowledge, truth, or answers? Wow! You are just here to keep asking stupid and irrelevant questions, until everyone gets tired of answering and drop out? And then you claim victory?

You really must have very little respect for yourself. Or, are the most insecure person of the planet. Sad!
 

chris155au

Active member
No you don't. And this says it all,

"Nope, I just keep on going, while people such as yourself HOPELESSLY drop out of debate..".

You enter into a debate ONLY TO GO THE DISTANCE? You are NOT searching for knowledge, truth, or answers? Wow! You are just here to keep asking stupid and irrelevant questions, until everyone gets tired of answering and drop out?
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with me asking any questions considering that I'm not asking any! It was just your pathetic excuse!
 

Shellandshilo1956

Active member
probably not ... and so what if you made that distinction? you in doing so were wrong. I am not.
Maybe I am wrong. Maybe you are just incapable of understanding even your own posts. Maybe being defensive and snarky is just part of your "A" game. In context, you said,

"probably not ... and so what if you made that distinction? you in doing so were wrong. I am not.".

If making this distinction is wrong, as you claim I am in doing so. Doesn't this mean, that if the distinction I made is wrong, dumb dumb, then there IS no distinction between you and Chris? Or, is this just another of your obfuscated bullshit comments, whenever you get caught saying something stupid?? Again!!

or is it just more of you totally ignoring what was said to you followed by just plain stupidty ..
I don't ignore anything you say. Unlike you, if you take the time to respond to me, then I should take the time to read ALL of what you say. That is called "intellectual courtesy". Clearly something you sorely lack.

But really comparing me to.., is probably the worst insult you could have come up with. That was really a low blow. Even for you! Of course, no explanations came with the insult. Oh well, just John being John! I'll get over it!

You are NOT like Chris. You're worse than Chris. At least he tries to run a bluff. But you actually believe the shit that comes out of your mouth.
 
Last edited:
Top