According to your inaccurate PERCEPTION I implied it.No, you just implied it, so that you could deny it when questioned.
As you accurately quoted, I said, "the women benefited from the Western cultural influences, while the MIC benefited from the money." I did NOT say anything about the MIC having to do with improving the lives of the Afghan women. Funny, you say that the MIC had "very little" to do with it, but I go even further than you do - I think that it has precisely NOTHING to do with it! How does it even have a LITTLE to do with it?"The women benefited from the Western cultural influences, while the MIC benefited from the money.".
The MIC have very little to do with improving the lives of the Afghan women(or people).
How exactly?In fact, they have everything to do with increasing the suffering of the Afghan people.
Yes, our culture is certainly superior. It turns out thatEmpowering and educating women is only symbolic of a Western culture. NOT a Middle Eastern Islamic Culture.
some cultures are better than others. Who knew!
Nope, it was merely a consequence of the commitment in Afghanistan.Correct!! So, do you think the goal of our commitment in Afghanistan was to empower and educate women?
To root out terrorism, following 9/11 which was planned there. It didn't work though. We can agree on that much at least.Why did we sacrifice our soldiers in Afghanistan? What did we hope to achieve in Afghanistan?
Who do I think financially profited? The MIC obviously.Who do you think profited the most, the people or the MIC?
No, the Americans SUPPORTED the Afghan National Army. They did not CONTROL it.Surely you are not this naïve, are you? Even though it was the Americans who controlled the Afghan National Army(ANA), the Taliban still controlled most of the country.
This article doesn't say that the animals ruled from 2001-August 2021. Just that they rule NOW. Which they do obviously.