Morrison defends mostly peaceful protesters - the left loose their minds!

chris155au

Active member
you cannot honestly pretend that scummo is a good PM?
According to what metric of "good?" He remains ahead as preferred prime minister, 44% to 28%.
preferred prime minister poll is as meaningless as polling on what brand of toilet paper you use and pretending that will affect the outcome of an election. What do the polls say on the TPP polling? They're the most important numbers and yet you didn't use them ... why?
Them most important for what? For determining if people think that a PM is "good?" Remember, that is what we are talking about here.
 

johnsmith

Moderator
Staff member
Them most important for what? For determining if people think that a PM is "good?" Remember, that is what we are talking about here.
how does preferred Pm tell you if he is good? Is that what you tell yourself?

If I ask you in a poll to vote for dying by arsenic or dying by car crash, does that mean you think either is good? Or might you prefer to not die but as that wasn't an option you went with A or B?


If people thought he was a good PM his party would be winning the 2PP polling. Don't forget, elections are for governments to loose, not oppositions to win. If people think govt. is doing a good job no opposition would ever win an election.
 

chris155au

Active member
how does preferred Pm tell you if he is good? Is that what you tell yourself?

If I ask you in a poll to vote for dying by arsenic or dying by car crash, does that mean you think either is good? Or might you prefer to not die but as that wasn't an option you went with A or B?
Alright. Reasonable point.

If people thought he was a good PM his party would be winning the 2PP polling.
Shouldn't the preferred PM's party be winning the 2PP polling? Maybe it just points to how utterly inadequate polling is.
 

johnsmith

Moderator
Staff member
Alright. Reasonable point.

Shouldn't the preferred PM's party be winning the 2PP polling? Maybe it just points to how utterly inadequate polling is.
For decades preferred PM wasn't even looked at until the libs and their monkeys started pushing it to, at various stages, hide their flailing popularity over the years. It is meaningless for reasons I've already explained. The only true indicator is the 2PP ... and even that is not always right.
 

chris155au

Active member
For decades preferred PM wasn't even looked at until the libs and their monkeys started pushing it to, at various stages, hide their flailing popularity over the years. It is meaningless for reasons I've already explained.
Meaningless because it's inaccurate?
 

johnsmith

Moderator
Staff member
If BOTH are accurate, then the preferred PM's party should be winning the 2PP polling. So at least one must be useless.

you don't listen very well do you. It's not inacurate, it's fucking meaningless. Prefered PM is not in any way an indicator of how people will vote and it never has been.
 

chris155au

Active member
you don't listen very well do you. It's not inacurate, it's fucking meaningless. Prefered PM is not in any way an indicator of how people will vote and it never has been.
Okay, but does this mean that people who say who their preferred PM is could easily vote for the other party?
 

Shellandshilo1956

Active member
Do politicians not lie?
Politicians don't actually lie. They simply speak a nonsense language, that accommodates for all creative political narratives(lies).

Surely you don't think that the only people who have lost their jobs for not getting vaccinated are people who have lost their jobs because of government mandates.
And just when you were doing so well with being honest!! I DO think that an employer who fires an employee for NOT providing evidence of being vaccinated, is doing so specifically because the employee is NOT providing proof of vaccination. And, because this is the new mandate by the Government. No Jab No Job!!

If an employee is "bonking" the boss's wife, is stealing from the company, is a racist or misogynist, or is violating other company or criminal laws, the employee might also be fired. But of course, these are NOT the people I was talking about, right?
 

chris155au

Active member
Politicians don't actually lie. They simply speak a nonsense language, that accommodates for all creative political narratives(lies).
Trump never lied?

And just when you were doing so well with being honest!!
I have no idea what you're referring to. How am I not being honest?

I DO think that an employer who fires an employee for NOT providing evidence of being vaccinated, is doing so specifically because the employee is NOT providing proof of vaccination. And, because this is the new mandate by the Government. No Jab No Job!!
Maybe I can phrase it in a different way: Surely you don't think that no employer has adopted their own voluntary vaccine mandate policy.
 

Biggles53

Member
Oh yes, and meanwhile it's only the BEST who rise to the top in the Labor party like Shorten even though he managed to loose two elections!
For fuck’s sake…learn some English…! It’s LOSE, not LOOSE..!

“Loose” are the one or two brain cells you have bouncing around in your skull…
 

chris155au

Active member
For fuck’s sake…learn some English…! It’s LOSE, not LOOSE..!

“Loose” are the one or two brain cells you have bouncing around in your skull…
You're clearly a Labor supporter and are hurt by what I said about the USELESS Shorten, and you have nothing to say other than some grammar police crap! :ROFL1

I'll repeat it for you: meanwhile it's only the BEST who rise to the top in the Labor party like Shorten even though he managed to lose two elections! :ROFL1
 

HBS Guy

Head Honcho 💉💉
Staff member
No, to make an argument language has to be precise. If you fuck up lose — loose your argument is probanbly worthless and it is worthless.


Did nothing affecrt the result of the last election except Shorten v Morriscum? Well?
 
Top