Head Honcho 💉💉
What exactly is he saying about Ivermectin that makes him sound like an idiot? The idiots who are deserving of this reward, are those flogging the usage of a lab-created drug, that is unnecessary, unsafe, and have no pathogens in it.
How do you know? You do know that it is still being used to treat Covid-19 victims? Even in Australia. Ivermectin has been used, even before Covid-19 vaccines were even thought about? And, it is a treatment being used today. You should really read how the words are being phrased. Because no one is saying that it doesn't work. But they certainly are implying and insinuating it. I wonder if it has something to do with its low cost of treatment??it doesn't work
Do you hear yourself. INCONCLUSIVE DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT DOESN'T WORK!! Did you miss the part where it is still being successfully used to treat Covid-19? Or, that doctors are still prescribing Ivermectin to their patients? So exactly what was inconclusive about the studies? Were seriously ill patients NOT getting better? How was the treatment failing?there have been multiple studies, and all of them have been inconclusive. If it worked they'd know by now.
Stating that something doesn't work, and then stating that this doesn't mean that something does work, is just saying the same thing a different way(tautology). Since you won't answer my questions, I have no idea what you are trying to say. You say that Ivermectin doesn't work. This is a lie. We can prove that it stops viral replication in the lab. You say that there is no evidence. This is also another lie. How many more results and findings will it take, before you call them evidence? I just have no idea why you would say that Ivermectin doesn't work, when there is so much evidence supporting that it does. The best vague conclusion the government can claim. is that the evidence is inconclusive.it also doesn't mean that it does work.
So the reason why it doesn't work, is that if it did, then there would be evidence that it did work. Ignoring that the absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence, why are you dismissing without explanation, all the findings and evidence, supporting the efficacy of Ivermectin? Do you even know what the articles, the results, the trials, and the underlying science even mean?? Is this why you keep ignoring my questions?What it DOES mean however is that there was no evidence that it worked. Like I said, if it worked they'd know by now.
So you are saying that these researcher are claiming that Ivermectin is the cure for Covid-19? Really? Do you know anyone who is claiming that aspirin is the cure for Covid-19?? Or, anyone claiming that Ivermectin is the cure for Covid-19?? But to be clear, people will take aspirins for the pain, and to lower an elevated temp. And, people who already have Covid-19(any severity), will take Ivermectin to stop the virus from replicating and causing more tissue damage(infections).that's like someone with mild covid taking an aspirin then claiming the aspirin cured his covid.
How do you know this? Aren't you just assuming that this must be true? We couldn't kill a virus before this pandemic, and we can't kill one now. We have the same problem with viruses, as we do with cancers. We can't prevent either. It as also irrelevant what the intended purpose of any drug is. The only thing that matters, is if it works or not.That is for sure. Ivermectin was NOT designed to work on viruses. After nearly two fucking years of pandemic anything that worked would be being used!
Vaccine hesitancy?? I like Informed and autonomous!!Pretty much. Vaccine hesitancy.
I think it is more about WHAT is being put into your arm, than it is about how it is being put into your arms. But by all means, cling to whatever narrative you want. So, now millions of people have suddenly come down with trypanophobia. Really? And this sounds rational to you??Vaccine hesitancy. Adults acting like babies.
No John I was being sarcastic. No rational person would think that this response would make a sensible argument. It is just circular reasoning and ignorance. "It's right, because it's right.". I'm not going to waste time with you John. You know nothing, contribute nothing, and will believe only what you are told to believe. Since you are intellectually lazy, and have very little depth of knowledge, I would only be arguing with an answering machine.exactly!. Glad to see you finally caught on