Pseudoscience is not supported by data. Your "theories" aren't supported by data.
Yes we agree that a feature of pseudoscience, is that it is NOT supported by the data or by the science. So again, what is the specific pseudoscience that I have been practicing? What are the theories that are NOT supported by the data? What magical, supernatural, or non-scientific insight are you claiming that I'm using? For example, I have stated that,
recovered unvaccinated people do not need to be vaccinated, and why. Science.
the virus is spread by the severity of its symptoms. Control the symptoms, control the spread. Science.
keeping 26M people 2 meters apart, or wearing face masks are impossible to enforce and monitor. Physics/Science.
vaccines do not prevent deaths, serious symptoms, hospitalizations, or spreading the virus. Based on hospital admittance data.
the government has spent billions on these vaccines. So it has its own mandate to use them. Numerous reference sources(Australian Government).
this virus has a recovery rate of over 98%. Based on the daily reported data.
this virus has only infected less than 1% of the population in over 2 years. Current data.
children are somewhat spared from the severity of this virus, because of their highly charged innate immune response. Science/Biology.
the overwhelming majority of deaths are caused by other underlying multiple serious chronic health morbidities. Hospital data.
survival and severity depends only on the condition of the immune system. Vaccines use the immune system. Science, and Human Biology.
So, do any of these claims violate some scientific Theory? What facts, data, and stats, support your pseudoscience claim?? So please, stop making these stupid claims, just because you don't like what I'm saying. Unless of course you can back it up!