You are talking utter bullshit.
Is this your attempt to answer my question? Or, do you need a special degree?
It DOES have relevance you clown!
NO! Not without context, you moron. You can't just cheerypick whatever relevance you want, simply from the results you choose. Otherwise, I can say that more men with facial hair have died from Covid-19, than those clean shaven. Or, that more men than women have died. Or, that more over 70yo have died than under 70 yo. These are just independent facts, until you assign them some relevance through interpretation.
Once you do, then you need to explain what IS the DIRECT cause(SARS-CoV-2 virus), and the direct effect(death of 70yo and unshaven men). THEN IT WILL BECOME RELEVANT!!
If the vaccine was useless you would expect the serious illness and death rates to be the same for the vaxxed and unvaxxed. They are NOT the same, the unvaxxed die at a MUCH higher rate than the vaxxed. Severe vaccine reactions are rare.
I never said that these vaccines are useless(red herring). In fact these vaccines are very good at what they have been genetically engineered to do. But they are NOT your natural antibodies, and are useless against any other pathogens, or their variants.
In a population where less than 1% of the population is even infected, it would be more likely in a random sample of 100 people, that there will be ZERO people infected or dying with this virus. How many people do you know on your block who are infected, or have died??
However, if you selectively pick the criteria you want, the variables you want, and the results you want, then you can continue parroting the narative you're protecting. This is called, an argument from ignorance. ARE unvaxxed people dying more than vaxxed people, because they are unvaxxed, or from some other reason(compromised immune system, other chronic illnesses, chonic therapy, etc.)?
The null hypothesis, that the vaccines work, has to be accepted.
I think you mean the "alternative hypothesis". The null hypothesis means,
"The null hypothesis is that there is
NO DIFFERENCE between two possibilities. The null hypothesis is that the observed difference is due to chance alone.".
This means that there is NO DIFFERENCE between the deaths in vaxxed and unvaxxed results. Is this what you now believe??
Do you have anything concrete to say to refute the above or only yet more tiresome conspiracy theory nonsense?
Exactly WHO has accepts this nonsense? Another one of your straw man? Is it a conspiracy theory that 5yo are now being jabbed with this poison? Or, that the drug companies have NOT revealed everything that is in their vaccine? Since when do we need to vaccinate a 5yo against the flu? Unless there are other complications, their thymus, spleen, and lymph glands/system, will protect them from any pathogen we can imagine. This vaccine is totally unnecessary for a 5yo.
Three million vaccines are being distributed ahead of the start of the school year to enable the 2.3 million children now eligible to be vaccinated against COVID to get their first vaccine
www.health.gov.au
But keep parroting, like a good company man!