Are you for real? Nobody can be this naïve. because they will still seek out and procure abortions but they will be outside of the medical umbrella that can properly care for them, prior, during and post.
⮞ Texas Abortion Ban Stays In Effect With Help From SCOTUS ⮜
- Thread starter DreamRyderX
- Start date
Incorrect. And tis above all things displays the naivety of your position.
Once born, a child is dependant on other people. Not necessarily the mother. At that point, the burden of the child can be equally shared amongst people. Until that point, the entire burden falls upon the mother, QED, the mother has more say in what happens to her body that anybody else.
This s why men don't get equal rights in a just society over the choices around pregnancy. Biology dictates the terms. Take your god bothering up with god.
chris155au
Active member
What if there are no other people?
What do you mean men don't get equal rights?
When did I mention God?
chris155au
Active member
Why do you assume that those providing the illegal abortions would be people with no medical experience? Why would SOME actual abortion doctors not continue to do them?
chris155au
Active member
OF COURSE we are! You can't even defend your own position! How telling! "The mother's immune system would normally kill this alien." What an insane pile of TOTAL NONSENSE!
chris155au
Active member
Roe v Wade = after the point have viability, States can ban elective abortion and only abortion to save the life of the mother must be provided. Simple!
chris155au
Active member
Try telling me that a child rapist/murderer should not be killed, while a baby in the womb should be allowed to be killed. If you think that they shouldn't be killed, TRY explaining why. You probably won't even ATTEMPT to explain why!
greggerypeccary
Active member
Under no circumstances whatsoever do I support capital punishment.
Civilised people do not condone the state-sanctioned killing of prisoners.
I'll repeat, just so you understand:
Under no circumstances whatsoever do I support capital punishment.
good reason to abort before it comes to that then.
chris155au
Active member
How convenient that you cut off the below! It turns out that I was right about the part in bold!
"while a baby in the womb should be allowed to be killed. If you think that they shouldn't be killed, TRY explaining why. You probably won't even ATTEMPT to explain why!"
chris155au
Active member
Why?
better than slowly starving to death
greggerypeccary
Active member
When did I say a baby should be allowed to be killed?How convenient that you cut off the below! It turns out that I was right about the part in bold!
"while a baby in the womb should be allowed to be killed. If you think that they shouldn't be killed, TRY explaining why. You probably won't even ATTEMPT to explain why!"
Maybe you could cut & paste the actual quote.
I'll be here waiting, okay?
Over to you ...
chris155au
Active member
I said "baby in the WOMB." If you're anti-abortion, then okay, but it seemed that you were not.
chris155au
Active member
A baby would starve just because there are no other people?
do you even know how to follow a conversation? go back and read through everything.
greggerypeccary
Active member
chris155au
Active member
You replied to this question of mine: "What if there are no other people?"
chris155au
Active member
What do you call the unborn in the womb?
greggerypeccary
Active member
I call it the same thing that everyone on the planet calls it: a fetus.
But let's get back to what we were discussing:
When did I say a baby should be allowed to be killed?