New Ice Age

[Dax]

I can't understand that last graph.

Monk - one day you'll thank me for showing you the light.

[HBS Guy]

You reckon you are an engineer and you can’t understand the last graph?

Do you know what ln(x) means?

Show me the light? You have shown me the words of an obvious lying charlatan, a scammer!

[Sir Bobby]

I can't understand that last graph.

Monk - one day you'll thank me for showing you the light.

You explain it Dax,
don't go and ask Monk in the members room - so your appear smart.
No cheating now!

Most graphs will have say time on the x axis & some other variable such as temperature on the Y axis.
That is a strange graph.

cheers
your humble servant and messenger

Bobby

[HBS Guy]

It is a standard graph. No time or dates involved and they do not have to be.

What does ln(x) mean, Booby?

[Sir Bobby]

It is a standard graph. No time or dates involved and they do not have to be.

What does ln(x) mean, Booby?

High school kids know that,

it's loge to base e - the natural log.

[HBS Guy]

Took you long enough to Google that.

Now take another look at that graph and tell me what you see, Gobby.

[Sir Bobby]

Took you long enough to Google that.

Now take another look at that graph and tell me what you see, Gobby.

No Monkey boy.
Let Dax explain it without any help since he laughed so much.
By the way - I use the exponential function quite a lot in my work.

[HBS Guy]

Bullshit, you had to Google ln(x) and now you STILL don’t know what the graph represents.

[HBS Guy]

I guess Booby could Google ln(x) but he can’t find the image to see what it is about

[Sir Bobby]

I guess Booby could Google ln(x) but he can’t find the image to see what it is about

I notice Dax took off in a hurry.
No one can understand that crazy graph.
Post something meaningful.
Stop wasting valuable time.

[HBS Guy]

It is a very good graph. It shows, ignoramus, how CO2 concentration and global temperatures are related.

There is a time element in the graph. Can you identify it? Two time elements, actually.

[HBS Guy]

Greenland total mass balance:



Shows Greenland is losing net ice.

[HBS Guy]

The graph Booby couldn’t understand:



It comes from a Keith Pickering:

Keith Pickering
‏

@KeithAPickering Follow Follow @KeithAPickering More

Replying to @GillesnFio @MightyApollo and 42 others
"no evidence"? Why are these data linear?

Can you answer the “why linear” question, Princess Gobby?

CO2 concentrations are increasing exponentially so the log (the natural logarithm) of CO2 concentration is plotted on the X axis. So we have a log-linear graph. These are pretty standard in engineering and science, Booby didn’t have a clue, notice that?

The Y-axis is temperature anomalies.

Since CO2 concentrations increase over time there is a time element in the graph. Again, Booby could not spot this. Unusual for such a highly trained engineer The left part of the X axis is obviously older readings, moving to the right we get more recent readings. None of this is hard. Further, the log of the CO2 concentration 21 years before the temperature reading is used. That is a bit odd?

I am not sure how they settled on 21 years. However, the main effect of CO2 is to raise temperature a bit and this raised temperature increases water vapor in the atmosphere and this provides 75% of the warming. So goes forever the mantra that CO2 follows temperature, it leads it.

The graph shows the very strong correlation of CO2 and temperature. We see no cooling—Booby’s ice age is stuff to fool intellectual babies. Nor does Greenland ice show any increase and we know the last of the thick, multiyear ice has gone from the Arctic Ocean. Only a fool believes we are heading into a mini ice age.

[HBS Guy]

For the intellectually challenged Booby, a different log-lin chart. Won’t make it any easier for Booby, of course:



The chart indicates the time element that the log-lin chart contained.

[HBS Guy]

Global Mean Sea Level, also not showing any imaginary (but profitable for scammers) mini ice age:



Let us look at the sea level over a longer timescale:

The red line shows the sea level rate through time; the blue line shows the average level for comparison. The acceleration is obvious.

https://tamino.wordpress.com/2017/01/30/sea-level-acceleration/

So sea level rise is accelerating. Means Greenland and Antarctica are both adding to ocean rise, as is thermal expansion of the warming sea water. No sign of a mini ice age.

[HBS Guy]

Seems I have scared off Booby who obviously has no Uni education at all!

[HBS Guy]

The MWP and LIA and today:



From: https://t.co/wTH3rFwGJV

Can Princess Gobby interpret this graph? Not holding my breath.

[HBS Guy]

New mini ice age shouts Princess Gobby.

Not really—giant iceberg about to break off the Pine Island Glacier:

https://www.livescience.com/63782-pine-island-glacier-rift.html

If the resulting iceberg is large enough, it will receive a name, Lhermitte noted. But, regardless of whether the crack leads to one or many icebergs, this will be the sixth large-calving event that Pine Island Glacier has experienced since 2001, he said.

Granted, it's natural for a glacier to calf icebergs. But what's concerning about Pine Island Glacier is that it's calving icebergs more frequently than it used to, Lhermitte said. Pine Island Glacier birthed icebergs in January 2001, November 2007, December 2011, August 2015 and September 2017.

[HBS Guy]

Another challenge for the deluded {rincess Gobby:

[HBS Guy]

A video from a real expert in her field. Dr Jennifer Francis talks about the Jet Stream and how that governed the behavior of Florence (and, probably, Hurricane Michael.)





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZTiFA39T8I

[HBS Guy]

Dubyne & Co likely funded by Big Oil to sow uncertainty re AGW.

[HBS Guy]

2018, a La Nina year, is 69% likely to be a top 5 warmest year, possibly 4th warmest. Go through the temperature record and you see that 5th warmest year occur all through the record since 1970. Each warmest year is warmer than the previous record.



What is staggering: La Nina year 2018 is way warmer than big El Nino year 1998! Just think on that for a minute: La Nina years are now warmer than El Nino years used to be just 2 decades previous to the La Nina year!

Also see how much warmer we are than the late 1800s. An ice age now is not going to happen. Dubyne is a liar.