Circumcision

Forum rules
The rules for this board are in the Charter of Moderation. Off Topic is for fairly serious discussion of things other than politics and current affair.

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:rain :yak yak :zzzz :roll :bgrin :bike :purple :yellow :jump :beer :OMG :huh :WTF :Hi :mad :buddy :tweed :? :emb :wub :oops :stop :gsp :stay :rofl :sad :grn :thumb :yahoo :S :hush :B :h :gup :c :giggle :clap :rose :smitten :hot :hlo :meet :nah :read :scare :smack :b :PC :slap
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Circumcision

Re: Circumcision

Post by pinkeye » 03 Sep 2018, 21:35

[quote="Squire" Was the performer a guy with a beard and a black hat?

Why did you do it at age 30?

Is it possible Sprintcyclist used circumcision to cure grossly excessive continuous masturbation?

I see you remain a coward who is happy to display the male circumcision, BUT HASN'T GOT THE STOMACH to put up a picture of female circumcision.
You'd puke your guts. Something you DON'T want men to see and understand. ?

Coward. Hypocrite and all around scumbag.

Re: Circumcision

Post by pinkeye » 03 Sep 2018, 21:31

Dax wrote:
Sprintcyclist wrote:
Squire wrote:
Sprintcyclist wrote:I was circumcised when in my 30's.

In my experience being circumcised is better.
But a bad operation would be bad.
Would only get it done if required.


Was the performer a guy with a beard and a black hat?

Why did you do it at age 30?


The surgeon was a surgeon, in a hospital.

I had an infection. Apparently quite a commonish complaint.


Amongst those who have bad hygiene it's common.


That isn't necessarily true at all Dax.

Living in hot humid conditions, or very damp places is always going to be a problem for a foreskin. What? you want to use bleach? Sorry it wouldn't work

Moulds and fungus are extremely difficult to get rid of, and casting aspersions on all men who suffer this sort of thing is crass and ignorant. But I do agree that for many men, poor hygiene in that area can cause life long problems.


As for my personal experience ?? you wouldn't want to know, I can assure you. Yu don't want to hear it.

Re: Circumcision

Post by Dax » 03 Sep 2018, 17:26

Sprintcyclist wrote:
Squire wrote:
Sprintcyclist wrote:I was circumcised when in my 30's.

In my experience being circumcised is better.
But a bad operation would be bad.
Would only get it done if required.


Was the performer a guy with a beard and a black hat?

Why did you do it at age 30?


The surgeon was a surgeon, in a hospital.

I had an infection. Apparently quite a commonish complaint.


Amongst those who have bad hygiene it's common.

Re: Circumcision

Post by Sprintcyclist » 03 Sep 2018, 14:50

Squire wrote:
Sprintcyclist wrote:I was circumcised when in my 30's.

In my experience being circumcised is better.
But a bad operation would be bad.
Would only get it done if required.


Was the performer a guy with a beard and a black hat?

Why did you do it at age 30?


The surgeon was a surgeon, in a hospital.

I had an infection. Apparently quite a commonish complaint.

Re: Circumcision

Post by Squire » 03 Sep 2018, 14:03

Sprintcyclist wrote:I was circumcised when in my 30's.

In my experience being circumcised is better.
But a bad operation would be bad.
Would only get it done if required.


Was the performer a guy with a beard and a black hat?

Why did you do it at age 30?

Is it possible Sprintcyclist used circumcision to cure grossly excessive continuous masturbation?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3255211/

Other studies, however, did find some negative effects. In one, which mostly included men seeking circumcision for health problems such as phimosis, balantis and condyloma, 32% of participants reported problems, including a decrease in erectile function and sensitivity (J Urol 2002; 167:2113–6). In another study, 20% of circumcised adults said their sex lives had worsened and 48% reported a decrease in pleasure from masturbation (BJUI 2007; 99:619–22).

Re: Circumcision

Post by Sprintcyclist » 03 Sep 2018, 12:48

pinkeye wrote:
Sprintcyclist wrote:I was circumcised when in my 30's.

In my experience being circumcised is better.
But a bad operation would be bad.
Would only get it done if required.



Indeed, and thanks for your honesty.


Anytime.
For me operations are sort of a 'compulsory' thing.
To be sedated to the state where someone can cut you open and you not know anything about that is not something to be done on a whim.

Re: Circumcision

Post by pinkeye » 02 Sep 2018, 21:52

Sprintcyclist wrote:I was circumcised when in my 30's.

In my experience being circumcised is better.
But a bad operation would be bad.
Would only get it done if required.



Indeed, and thanks for your honesty.

Re: Circumcision

Post by Dax » 02 Sep 2018, 15:48

Sprintcyclist wrote:I was circumcised when in my 30's.

In my experience being circumcised is better.
But a bad operation would be bad.
Would only get it done if required.


More fool you.

Re: Circumcision

Post by Sprintcyclist » 02 Sep 2018, 14:29

I was circumcised when in my 30's.

In my experience being circumcised is better.
But a bad operation would be bad.
Would only get it done if required.

Re: Circumcision

Post by Dax » 02 Sep 2018, 07:15

pinkeye wrote:ahh .. but you see I DON"T believe . But the King James Bible has long been the texts used in churches. Always amazes me how religious can pick and choose, to bolster just about any position they want to take.
BUT.. you cannot deny the lie, that a uncircumcised man feels more pleasure than one circumcised. It is just plain and utter BS, and all you poor guys mourning that bit of skin are fuckwits.
PLAIN and SIMPLE. :du :up


What is your experience in the difference between the two, typically as a PC nutter, zero and you never will. So your claims are typical of the clueless and bigoted ravings of the deluded, or do you just like to see people suffer because they had no say in the matter. That's pretty depraved, but par for the course.

Re: Circumcision

Post by Sprintcyclist » 02 Sep 2018, 06:34

Image

Re: Circumcision

Post by pinkeye » 01 Sep 2018, 22:01

ahh .. but you see I DON"T believe . But the King James Bible has long been the texts used in churches. Always amazes me how religious can pick and choose, to bolster just about any position they want to take.
BUT.. you cannot deny the lie, that a uncircumcised man feels more pleasure than one circumcised. It is just plain and utter BS, and all you poor guys mourning that bit of skin are fuckwits.
PLAIN and SIMPLE. :du :up

Re: Circumcision

Post by Dax » 01 Sep 2018, 09:52

pinkeye wrote:Here is the King James Bible reference

Genesis Chapter 17 The covenant of circumcision...…


Genesis 17 - 9 to 27.

So there it is, in the Bible.

Chapter 18 is interesting, as well.


It's not a bad read actually. :read


Using a very bad version of a book about a mythical debauched war god, is hilariously pathetic. The king james bible, like all other bibles has no relevance to the original text. If you want to know what the stories really said, read the hebrew and greek interlinear texts and you will soon see the insanity in believing in pure violent mythology.

Re: Circumcision

Post by pinkeye » 01 Sep 2018, 01:47

Here is the King James Bible reference

Genesis Chapter 17 The covenant of circumcision...…


Genesis 17 - 9 to 27.

So there it is, in the Bible.

Chapter 18 is interesting, as well.


It's not a bad read actually. :read

Re: Circumcision

Post by pinkeye » 01 Sep 2018, 01:24

Don't be a fool.

I have read on here that some men complain that they don't get full sexual enjoyment, because they are circumcised.

NOW .. on the face of it, that is clearly fallacious.
It , in fact, beggars belief .


Seriously guys...

done as an infant, there is no way to even establish such a claim. You have NO WAY of KNOWING this. Perhaps you have discussions with uncircumcised men...?
This is just a furphy... Oh woe poor me I don't have a foreskin. Boo hoo . Well, if THAT is a problem for you, because you think you aren't getting all the pleasure YOU IMAGINE... you are a true fuckwit.

Re: Circumcision

Post by Dax » 31 Aug 2018, 12:04

pinkeye wrote:
Squire wrote:Get a grip.

Image


Yeah a girl can hope it's NOT THERE.

Some men are filthy ... you cannot deny it. And many men who have been circumcised as a little wee baby.... needed that help to maintain their health. Ços lets face it men don't care for themselves very well, as a rule of thumb, without a woman to look after them.
Just the facts. We all know it.
Yeah some Men are finally learning from the examples set for them by their mother's, spouses, girlfriends, friends,, BUT MANY couldn't do it alone. For all these poor souls circumcision is a blessing.
After all, the foreskin is just that... a sheath of dermis, skin hair, very little in the way of nerves or anything other than capillaries.
A little protection in a savage world.

Well we are civilised now, no wolves to tear the younguns away from the fire by their foreskins. :roll :roll :bgrin

Now seriously SQUIRE... you were more than happy to post a picture of a male circumcision... so do as I asked you months ago, and have a look … find some photo's of female genital circumcision... AND PUT IT UP.
I challenge you to put it UP. I DARE YOU.
I think it is something YOU ALL ought to see and understand.

All males, or females, who think there is some comparison to these mutilations, if you like, and all women who have never had the courage to look on this aberration of a practice, but have an opinion. Come on show us...……….. .

There are valid reasons, physical reasons for male circumcision. That's why some religions adopted it as a cultural practice. Cleanliness, in other words.

There are no valid reasons for female genital circumcision.
CUSTOM.......... IS NOT ONE.



You must walk in some very debauched social circles, there are some men who are filthy, but billions more women who are chemically filthy and stink like shit.

There are no valid reasons for the removal of the foreskin, non whatsoever. Religion developed it for the same reason they developed female circumcision, the desire to see people feel no pleasure and suffer for god, nothing else.

Every man I associate with don't need a women to look after them in any way, many lead single lives because they are sick of providing for useless mirror/phone looking women. I'm that way, the only women who I associate with have to be my equal in ability endeavour and understanding. Of course I'm talking about rural people, most urban clones are pretty useless at anything of worth, male or female. None could survive without their shops, everything provided for them and some one to hold their hands.

Re: Circumcision

Post by Dax » 31 Aug 2018, 12:03

pinkeye wrote:
Squire wrote:Get a grip.

Image


Yeah a girl can hope it's NOT THERE.

Some men are filthy ... you cannot deny it. And many men who have been circumcised as a little wee baby.... needed that help to maintain their health. Ços lets face it men don't care for themselves very well, as a rule of thumb, without a woman to look after them.
Just the facts. We all know it.
Yeah some Men are finally learning from the examples set for them by their mother's, spouses, girlfriends, friends,, BUT MANY couldn't do it alone. For all these poor souls circumcision is a blessing.
After all, the foreskin is just that... a sheath of dermis, skin hair, very little in the way of nerves or anything other than capillaries.
A little protection in a savage world.

Well we are civilised now, no wolves to tear the younguns away from the fire by their foreskins. :roll :roll :bgrin

Now seriously SQUIRE... you were more than happy to post a picture of a male circumcision... so do as I asked you months ago, and have a look … find some photo's of female genital circumcision... AND PUT IT UP.
I challenge you to put it UP. I DARE YOU.
I think it is something YOU ALL ought to see and understand.

All males, or females, who think there is some comparison to these mutilations, if you like, and all women who have never had the courage to look on this aberration of a practice, but have an opinion. Come on show us...……….. .

There are valid reasons, physical reasons for male circumcision. That's why some religions adopted it as a cultural practice. Cleanliness, in other words.

There are no valid reasons for female genital circumcision.
CUSTOM.......... IS NOT ONE.



You must walk in some very debauched social circles, there are some men who are filthy, but billions more women who are chemically filthy and stink like shit.

There are no valid reasons for the removal of the foreskin, non whatsoever. Religion developed it for the same reason they developed female circumcision, the desire to see people feel no pleasure and suffer for god, nothing else.

Every man I associate with don't need a women to look after them in any way, many lead single lives because they are sick of providing for useless mirror/phone looking women. I'm that way, the only women who I associate with have to be my equal in ability endeavour and understanding. Of course I'm talking about rural people, most urban clones are pretty useless at anything of worth, male or female. None could survive without their shops, everything provided for them and some one to hold their hands.

Re: Circumcision

Post by pinkeye » 31 Aug 2018, 01:17

Squire wrote:Get a grip.

Image


Yeah a girl can hope it's NOT THERE.

Some men are filthy ... you cannot deny it. And many men who have been circumcised as a little wee baby.... needed that help to maintain their health. Ços lets face it men don't care for themselves very well, as a rule of thumb, without a woman to look after them.
Just the facts. We all know it.
Yeah some Men are finally learning from the examples set for them by their mother's, spouses, girlfriends, friends,, BUT MANY couldn't do it alone. For all these poor souls circumcision is a blessing.
After all, the foreskin is just that... a sheath of dermis, skin hair, very little in the way of nerves or anything other than capillaries.
A little protection in a savage world.

Well we are civilised now, no wolves to tear the younguns away from the fire by their foreskins. :roll :roll :bgrin

Now seriously SQUIRE... you were more than happy to post a picture of a male circumcision... so do as I asked you months ago, and have a look … find some photo's of female genital circumcision... AND PUT IT UP.
I challenge you to put it UP. I DARE YOU.
I think it is something YOU ALL ought to see and understand.

All males, or females, who think there is some comparison to these mutilations, if you like, and all women who have never had the courage to look on this aberration of a practice, but have an opinion. Come on show us...……….. .

There are valid reasons, physical reasons for male circumcision. That's why some religions adopted it as a cultural practice. Cleanliness, in other words.

There are no valid reasons for female genital circumcision.
CUSTOM.......... IS NOT ONE.

Re: Circumcision

Post by pinkeye » 31 Aug 2018, 01:16

Is that meant to mean something?

What, you want powdered foreskin to wear in a leather sack around your neck, to reclaim that which was RIPPED FROM YOU.? :bgrin

Re: Circumcision

Post by Squire » 29 Aug 2018, 13:39

Squire wrote:Reclaim the foreskin from the foreskin thieves.

Superman still has his foreskin.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/new-york-city-circumcision-america-protest-infant-sons-foreskin-a8500026.html

Image

Re: Circumcision

Post by Squire » 29 Aug 2018, 13:17

Get a grip.

Image

Re: Circumcision

Post by Squire » 29 Aug 2018, 13:15

Reclaim the foreskin from the foreskin thieves.

Image

Re: Circumcision

Post by pinkeye » 11 Apr 2018, 00:40

Dax wrote:
pinkeye wrote: We're much more civilised here. :buddy


:huh :rofl


I do hope you are not casting aspersions on this Forum.!!

BECAUSE.. that is what I was referring to. THIS FORUM.

In a wider sense... i'd agree with your laughter. NO HUMANS are truly CIVILISED. We are smart animals for sure. To claim any higher status is just BULLSHIT.

Re: Circumcision

Post by Dax » 10 Apr 2018, 12:46

pinkeye wrote: We're much more civilised here. :buddy


:huh :rofl

Re: Circumcision

Post by mothra » 10 Apr 2018, 12:06

I saw a video the other day of a little girl being cut. She couldn't have been more than 18 months old.

She was sitting on a table, hair with lovely little clips, gnawing on a dummy. There was a sheet over her and her mtother standing beside her, stroking her.

Another woman put her head under the very clean looking white sheet.

The little girl just started crying. Just crying. She didn't even drop the dummy. Her mother went on stroking her hair while the other woman cut away.

It just tore my heart out. Had that child screamed, i don't think it would have effected me so profoundly ... but i'm a mum. I know that cry. That's the "help me mum" cry of a scared child. It was so much more than pain. And it was her mother, who lovingly put those little clips in her hair, that was doing that to her. Out of love for her and what she truly believes are in her best interests.

And man it shits me to tears when people with nothing to base their comments on than repulsion and horror pour their vehemence into categorical outraged condemnation.

It's not going to stop it from happening.

But they just don't get that.

Top