Wars

DonDeeHippy

Active member
Universal Gravity is a theory, not a fact, regarding the natural law of attraction. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered. The Universal Theory of Gravity is often taught in schools as a fact, when in fact it is not even a good theory.
 

MilesAway

Bongalong
Universal Gravity is a theory, not a fact, regarding the natural law of attraction. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered. The Universal Theory of Gravity is often taught in schools as a fact, when in fact it is not even a good theory.
You're a joke 🏌
 

Shellandshilo1956

Active member
Universal Gravity is a theory, not a fact, regarding the natural law of attraction. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered. The Universal Theory of Gravity is often taught in schools as a fact, when in fact it is not even a good theory.
Firstly, Gravity is NOT a Theory at all. It is a LAW. Laws only describe WHAT something will do. We observe how objects behave among other objects. We make calculations and predictions from our observations. If they are consistent, they will become Law(Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation) . But this tells us nothing about HOW something works, or WHY something works. There is no Theory of Gravity that describes the "how" and the "why" gravity works. For that you need Einstein's Theory of Relativity.

In either case, it is a provable FACT that the force of gravity exists. Most people who think like you about Gravity, are also very skeptical of the Theory of Evolution. Do you also think that the ToE is not a very good Theory?
 

johnsmith

Moderator
Staff member
You made two silly comments that even MilesAway pointed out.
So miles is as wrong as you and I'm supposed to be impressed?:ROFL1:ROFL1

You back-peddled away from them by denying one, and ignoring the other so far.
I haven't back peddled anything. I told you that you were trying to use semantics to excuse your stupidity. Then, in order to keep you happy, I applied those semantics to my argument to show you that you were still wrong. It's no my fault you're to stupid to see it.
 

greggerypeccary

Active member
Universal Gravity is a theory, not a fact, regarding the natural law of attraction. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered. The Universal Theory of Gravity is often taught in schools as a fact, when in fact it is not even a good theory.
 

Shellandshilo1956

Active member
no, I keep telling myself that because it's a FACT

If it is a fact, then there is no need to keep telling yourself that it is. Facts stand on their own. Unless of course, you can demonstrate that it is NOT a fact that dogs have fleas. Other than just because you say so. I didn't think so!!

So miles is as wrong as you and I'm supposed to be impressed
Clearly, the only thing in reality that can impress you, IS YOU!

I haven't back peddled anything. I told you that you were trying to use semantics to excuse your stupidity. Then, in order to keep you happy, I applied those semantics to my argument to show you that you were still wrong. It's no my fault you're to stupid to see it.
You applied nothing to my argument, other than a blatant lie. I'm not interested in your silly semantics games. What semantics am I using? This is exactly how you back-peddle. You twist what a person says, and claim that the person said it. I never claimed as a fact that ALL dogs have fleas. I claimed as a fact that DOGS have fleas. Very simple, and very true, and even a moron would agree with this. So now you're back-peddling to avoid admitting to an obvious truth. Which is why you are not answering my questions(like DDH). or supplying any evidence to back-up your unsupported comments.

So what did the Vet tell you about dogs having fleas? What can you deposit from the internet, that can support your claim, that it is NOT a fact that dogs have fleas? There must be some evidence that can support your claim, right? Come on, you can do it. Or, are we to expect more back-peddling?

I think rather than keep back-peddling, you should just stop talking period.
 

Shellandshilo1956

Active member
No, no, no:... The best was

Totally agree with you!! In fact, I met him personally at the Sydney Entertainment Ctr.(1996), and he autograph that album for me. It is framed as part of my collection.

I love Mayer's "Gravity" as well. Both are consummate entertainers. But, if James were alive today, I don't think he would fit well, into today's genre of "belly-aching", bitching, ego-tripping, and profanity-riddled songs(IMHO).
 

MilesAway

Bongalong
Totally agree with you!! In fact, I met him personally at the Sydney Entertainment Ctr.(1996), and he autograph that album for me. It is framed as part of my collection.

I love Mayer's "Gravity" as well. Both are consummate entertainers. But, if James were alive today, I don't think he would fit well, into today's genre of "belly-aching", bitching, ego-tripping, and profanity-riddled songs(IMHO).
No, he had class: he might've smoked crack before live interviews but nobody's perfect 🤸🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🤔🍔
 
Top