:grnSquire said:Landslide in favor of impeachment. A number of Republicans did not register a vote.
This rumor that some Republicans didn't vote is false. They all voted, and they all voted "No", along with a few Democrats.HBS Guy said:Now for the Senate.
Like here, the US is too partisan like preventing Obama from appointing a Supreme Court judge. That sucked, dirty bloody politics! The impeachment hearings will be the same. However, that not all Repugs voted could be a pointer to the impeachment hearings maybe not as smooth and easy for the douchebag as people thought?
I dunno. It was always going to be politics as usual by dirty players so I have taken no interest in it.
Frankly, Monk, neither have I. This has been all so predictable that I just haven't cared about it. I've only lightly followed the news on it up until today. For me, the only drama was wondering how many Democrats would vote against impeachment. It turned out to be 2 on one count and 3 on the other, with one more voting "Present" on both. But the overall vote was a forgone conclusion months ago, and so all the hoopla and lead-up to it has bored me.HBS Guy said:Now for the Senate.
Like here, the US is too partisan like preventing Obama from appointing a Supreme Court judge. That sucked, dirty bloody politics! The impeachment hearings will be the same. However, that not all Repugs voted could be a pointer to the impeachment hearings maybe not as smooth and easy for the douchebag as people thought?
I dunno. It was always going to be politics as usual by dirty players so I have taken no interest in it.
The voters made their decision in 2016, but they didn't get what they voted for.SethBullock said:Frankly, Monk, neither have I. This has been all so predictable that I just haven't cared about it. I've only lightly followed the news on it up until today. For me, the only drama was wondering how many Democrats would vote against impeachment. It turned out to be 2 on one count and 3 on the other, with one more voting "Present" on both. But the overall vote was a forgone conclusion months ago, and so all the hoopla and lead-up to it has bored me.HBS Guy said:Now for the Senate.
Like here, the US is too partisan like preventing Obama from appointing a Supreme Court judge. That sucked, dirty bloody politics! The impeachment hearings will be the same. However, that not all Repugs voted could be a pointer to the impeachment hearings maybe not as smooth and easy for the douchebag as people thought?
I dunno. It was always going to be politics as usual by dirty players so I have taken no interest in it.
If the Articles are sent to the Senate, that outcome is also a foregone conclusion. So I just want them to get it over with as soon as possible and let the voters make their decision in 11 months.
Seth
Yes, we all do.HBS Guy said:I wish the fucking Democrats had decided on a viable candidate, not loaded-with-baggage Hillary!
greggerypeccary said:The voters made their decision in 2016, but they didn't get what they voted for.SethBullock said:Frankly, Monk, neither have I. This has been all so predictable that I just haven't cared about it. I've only lightly followed the news on it up until today. For me, the only drama was wondering how many Democrats would vote against impeachment. It turned out to be 2 on one count and 3 on the other, with one more voting "Present" on both. But the overall vote was a forgone conclusion months ago, and so all the hoopla and lead-up to it has bored me.HBS Guy said:Now for the Senate.
Like here, the US is too partisan like preventing Obama from appointing a Supreme Court judge. That sucked, dirty bloody politics! The impeachment hearings will be the same. However, that not all Repugs voted could be a pointer to the impeachment hearings maybe not as smooth and easy for the douchebag as people thought?
I dunno. It was always going to be politics as usual by dirty players so I have taken no interest in it.
If the Articles are sent to the Senate, that outcome is also a foregone conclusion. So I just want them to get it over with as soon as possible and let the voters make their decision in 11 months.
Seth
I'm talking about the voting public, not the Electoral College, so don't come back with the usual "that's the way the system works" bullshit".
In November 2016 the voters quite clearly decided that they wanted Hillary Clinton as their President.
She received 3,000,000 more votes than the alleged child rapist, so it wasn't even close.
Yes, let the voters make their decision in 11 months, but will they actually get what they vote for?
Awwww john, don't tell me you'll run off kickin' & screamin too, all sortsa butt-hurt when President Trump gets acquitted by the US Senate....to remain the US President, & all the demon-RAT hoopla was for naught.johnsmith said:even fox' news viewers, who are mostly staunch republicans, think thrumpy is guilty
![]()
of course not ...i never expected the republicans to act honorably.DreamRyderX said:Awwww, don't tell me you'll run off kickin' & screamin too, all sortsa butt-hurt when President Trump gets acquitted in the US Senate....to remain the US President, & all the demon-RAT hoopla was for naught.
Totally. The USA is not a democracy.DreamRyderX said:greggerypeccary said:The voters made their decision in 2016, but they didn't get what they voted for.SethBullock said:Frankly, Monk, neither have I. This has been all so predictable that I just haven't cared about it. I've only lightly followed the news on it up until today. For me, the only drama was wondering how many Democrats would vote against impeachment. It turned out to be 2 on one count and 3 on the other, with one more voting "Present" on both. But the overall vote was a forgone conclusion months ago, and so all the hoopla and lead-up to it has bored me.HBS Guy said:Now for the Senate.
Like here, the US is too partisan like preventing Obama from appointing a Supreme Court judge. That sucked, dirty bloody politics! The impeachment hearings will be the same. However, that not all Repugs voted could be a pointer to the impeachment hearings maybe not as smooth and easy for the douchebag as people thought?
I dunno. It was always going to be politics as usual by dirty players so I have taken no interest in it.
If the Articles are sent to the Senate, that outcome is also a foregone conclusion. So I just want them to get it over with as soon as possible and let the voters make their decision in 11 months.
Seth
I'm talking about the voting public, not the Electoral College, so don't come back with the usual "that's the way the system works" bullshit".
In November 2016 the voters quite clearly decided that they wanted Hillary Clinton as their President.
She received 3,000,000 more votes than the alleged child rapist, so it wasn't even close.
Yes, let the voters make their decision in 11 months, but will they actually get what they vote for?
Could be the cause of your dismay might simply be that you, like so many others, are Constitutionally illiterate, errantly believing that the USA is a Democracy, where a majority vote determines who wins a Presidential Election. Tough titty when ya gotta chew the milk fella!!![]()
You couldn't be more wrong about the USA chump......the USA has never been, & hopefully will never ever be a Democracy.
The USA is a Constitutional Republic.....always has been since the American Founding Fathers decided it to be back in the late 18th century. They despised Democracy.
America may utilize a few Democratic Principals here & there, but in the end the rules/laws for it's Government depends totally on American Constitutional Law.....Yep, the United States Constitution, specifically Article II Section I which details how the US President is elected....elected by Presidential Electors, not determined by the majority popular vote as Gweggy fantasizes how it should be determined.......for 200+ years US Presidents have not been elected Democratically, but by a set of Chosen Electors determined by a clearly defined process outlined in law.......
Chew my shorts Gweggy........Fuck Democracy......XXXXXXXXX......give me the Presidential Electoral Collage any day over a Majority Popular Vote!!
johnsmith said:of course not ...i never expected the republicans to act honorably.DreamRyderX said:Awwww, don't tell me you'll run off kickin' & screamin too, all sortsa butt-hurt when President Trump gets acquitted in the US Senate....to remain the US President, & all the demon-RAT hoopla was for naught.
The only thing bipartisan about the vote was the vote against impeachment.johnsmith said:of course not ...i never expected the republicans to act honorably.DreamRyderX said:Awwww, don't tell me you'll run off kickin' & screamin too, all sortsa butt-hurt when President Trump gets acquitted in the US Senate....to remain the US President, & all the demon-RAT hoopla was for naught.
It is, however, reality that pinkeye is an idiot!pinkeye said:johnsmith said:of course not ...i never expected the republicans to act honorably.DreamRyderX said:Awwww, don't tell me you'll run off kickin' & screamin too, all sortsa butt-hurt when President Trump gets acquitted in the US Senate....to remain the US President, & all the demon-RAT hoopla was for naught.
Me either.
It is , it seems , a foregone conclusion that Trump will remain in Office.
Seems irrelevant that he is a criminal and a traitor.![]()
Go figure.ike
Umm I don't actually understand how that is either logical, or smart.
so anything that goes your way is bipartisan, anything against trump is partisan ... way to go Seth :grnSethBullock said:The only thing bipartisan about the vote was the vote against impeachment.johnsmith said:of course not ...i never expected the republicans to act honorably.DreamRyderX said:Awwww, don't tell me you'll run off kickin' & screamin too, all sortsa butt-hurt when President Trump gets acquitted in the US Senate....to remain the US President, & all the demon-RAT hoopla was for naught.