Assange - Revisited.

pinkeye

Wonder woman
Bye the bye..... the US Admin don't deny the presence of the Republican ,... some peculiar germanic sounding name..
HUH....
they just deny the matter discussed.
 

pinkeye

Wonder woman
Been listening.. and there is now ANOTHER LEAK, from the US Treasury.
So is THIS leak incriminating AUSTRALIAN BANKS in massive money-laundering a criminal act. ?
YES according to YOU.

I suspect people ... people who care about something other than US governmental power, are getting really pissed off about this gutless and corrupt and unethical attack on the person of Mr Assange. By TRUMP. no less.. :wtf:dunno2:roll

The guy that leaked about Vietnam war crimes by the US has come out in support.

So seems you 're all happy, and think the US can do what it likes. THAT is the only thing I can get from you'all.

Assange has not been convicted of ANY criminal offense as far as I know.

The list of court cases waiting for TRUMP, when he loses the power of the Presidential Office on the other hand , is HUGE.


LIKE CHI.NA.

So there you go.. just another crime.. the harassment of Mr Assange.

Seems to me the Australian government has been strangely silent on the whole Assange Affair. No comment No comment ignore and deny. Sad. Really sad.
, just like all the people held in foreign places by adversary govts where we leave them
just like all the Australians stuck overseas..

TOUGH SHIT.. NOT OUR ( the govt's) problem. Well fuck off ... you go overseas..?? you are on your own..

Assange is just the most obvious example of Australian Government failure to act on their obligation .. Just even the one WE ALL should be AWARE OF.....
Their DUTY OF CARE. !!!

Doesn't anyone here understand what I am saying..? Oh he's a criminal.! ?? Is he.? NO

Why spread such lies ? I think you have a personal agenda.. myself..? I am just looking for some reason why we abandoned him... and continue to do so.
I suspect it is governmental/media control... but I find it hard to accept this obdurate and unreasonable position you hold JS and Hippy.
You make bald statements , but your claims are proven wrong... can u possibly rethink this.?
 
Last edited:

DonDeeHippy

Active member
JS and Hippy.
You make bald statements , but your claims are proven wrong... can u possibly rethink this.?
Show a claim I have made that has been proven wrong Pinky...
I have repeatedly shown links to counter what you have said and you ignore them ,
Running on Emotions doesn't change facts....
Assange and the Labor party both can do no wrong and you wont hear otherwise..... purple bounce
 
Last edited:

pinkeye

Wonder woman
No one ever made that claim. You were dreaming
That harm came to those named was the reason you gave for being so negative about the situation.

Disclaim it if you like.. I don't care .. you won't disclose what your problem is with Assange then? Personally I mean.
From the very beginning when I started the earlier thread on Assange.. so if that isn't it ..? What is.?
 

pinkeye

Wonder woman
so you'll have no trouble quoting me
It is all in much earlier posts. I remember them.... do I want to scroll back through weeks of posts.? Not particularly.

Do you deny it.? Truly..? you don't remember? you don't recall?
you have no memory of that thought at all..?

I won't say you are dissembling, but you seem to deny what you held true, earlier.

Ask yourself ..look back at your own posts.

But just to keep you happy I might skim a few... or not.
 

pinkeye

Wonder woman
It's all the decision of a English judge what happens next to Assange . When the yanks are finished with him I want to see all the people destroyed and the families of those murdered that Assange created by indiscriminately releasing information take him to court... may he rot in jail forever....
was he worried about principles when he released the names of operatives and put their lives at risk?
OK this is just what is on the Revisited topic. Most of JS comment was on the earlier topic. Could I be bothered NO.

I did refer to both JS and Hippy ... JS has backed off, that's all.

What will be will be.
Que sera sera
 

DonDeeHippy

Active member
OK this is just what is on the Revisited topic. Most of JS comment was on the earlier topic. Could I be bothered NO.

I did refer to both JS and Hippy ... JS has backed off, that's all.

What will be will be.
Que sera sera
Lewis said many of these had suffered harm or threats because they had been named. He said some had disappeared



informants in the middle east that where named have disappeared, just because they can't prove they were murdered doesn't mean they where not and It doesn't change the fact he released personal information on people that would of ruined their lives...He needs to be accountable.....Then there is the whole civil war he started in Africa......I'm sure there are lots of families there that would love to have him over for dinner....
If a computer hacker releases personal information of just one person he can go to jail, Assange revealed hundreds, people have had to sneak out of countries because of his actions....Careers, reputations and relationships ruined of innocent people... purple bounce
 
Last edited:

johnsmith

Moderator
Staff member
OK this is just what is on the Revisited topic. Most of JS comment was on the earlier topic. Could I be bothered NO.

I did refer to both JS and Hippy ... JS has backed off, that's all.
I didn't back off anything. I'd always said it was a possibility. We'll never know if his leaks actually caused someone to get killed.
 

pinkeye

Wonder woman
So.. we disagree, and that is fair enough..

Hope they don't take too long to reach a decision. The Judge doesn't sound particularly disinterested.
 
Top